Don’t panic over disastrous GDP data

first_img Show Comments ▼ More From Our Partners Astounding Fossil Discovery in California After Man Looks Closelygoodnewsnetwork.orgRussell Wilson, AOC among many voicing support for Naomi Osakacbsnews.comA ProPublica investigation has caused outrage in the U.S. this weekvaluewalk.comPolice Capture Elusive Tiger Poacher After 20 Years of Pursuing the Huntergoodnewsnetwork.orgSupermodel Anne Vyalitsyna claims income drop, pushes for child supportnypost.comBrave 7-Year-old Boy Swims an Hour to Rescue His Dad and Little Sistergoodnewsnetwork.orgKiller drone ‘hunted down a human target’ without being told tonypost.comNative American Tribe Gets Back Sacred Island Taken 160 Years Agogoodnewsnetwork.org980-foot skyscraper sways in China, prompting panic and evacuationsnypost.comConnecticut man dies after crashing Harley into live bearnypost.comMatt Gaetz swindled by ‘malicious actors’ in $155K boat sale boondogglenypost.comMark Eaton, former NBA All-Star, dead at 64nypost.comBiden received funds from top Russia lobbyist before Nord Stream 2 giveawaynypost.comInside Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis’ not-so-average farmhouse estatenypost.comPuffer fish snaps a selfie with lucky divernypost.comUK teen died on school trip after teachers allegedly refused her pleasnypost.comFlorida woman allegedly crashes children’s birthday party, rapes teennypost.comI blew off Adam Sandler 22 years ago — and it’s my biggest Don’t panic over disastrous GDP data MEA culpa. The dramatic extent of yesterday’s collapse in reported GDP took me by surprise, though I realised a couple of weeks ago that the slowdown was sharper than previously thought. That the data confounded every professional forecaster polled by news agencies, as well as the Bank of England and all political parties, is only a partial excuse. So why did the ONS say that the UK shrank by 0.5 per cent, led by construction and the snow? And crucially does this imply a double-dip recession – something I have long argued would not happen – or a largely weather-related blip? We won’t know for sure until we start getting January figures – the first indication earlier this month that there was a problem in December came from the services purchasing managers’ index, which abruptly collapsed. If the survey remains negative, we will be in trouble; if not, then the fourth quarter will turn out to be what I think it really was – a bump in the road to recovery, similar to those we always see in upturns, exacerbated by our pathetic inability to cope with snow.Yesterday’s data was even more preliminary than usual. The ONS admitted that much of it was really guesswork. I have long thought that it would be better to wait a bit longer before providing the markets (and journalists) with absurd, incomplete figures which are always revised upwards, generally by about 0.2 percentage points. I well remember the last shock, for the fourth quarter of 2009: the consensus was for growth of 0.4 per cent – the first estimate came in at just 0.1 per cent. In the end, however, the data was revised up to 0.5 per cent. This is an almost scandalous indictment of current data release practices and proof that yesterday’s data should be taken with a bucket of salt. Even more than the overall figures, the composition of growth is always revised drastically. When one looks at third quarter 2010 numbers in detail, one soon realises that the components have completely changed. All the early analysis produced by the City and the media turned out to be worthless. Business surveys, even for December, do not indicate anything like as much weakness in GDP as the ONS reports.The ONS thinks that without the snow there would have been zero growth – I suspect that the end result will be to show that the underlying expansion was a little better than that. Another sign of relative strength: government revenues rose to £39.3bn in December compared to £37.8bn the previous year; clearly, despite the reversal of the VAT cut, this means the economy didn’t collapse. Yet it would be wrong to deny the existence of a slowdown: parts of the economy clearly paused for breath, probably from November, the weak employment figures suggest.As the EEF points out, in the few years following the recession in the 1980s quarterly growth rates oscillated between -0.7 per cent and 1.5 per cent. Up until the third quarter of 2010, growth coming out of the recession was faster than in the 1980s or 1990s. GDP is now 2.2 per cent higher than it was at the end of the recession – a weaker recovery than in the 1980s but a stronger one than the 1990s. The government should stick to its austerity plans, which did not cause yesterday’s supposed slump and which are the only way to prevent a sovereign crisis. It is not (yet) time to panic or predict a new recession – but you will be the first to know if I change my [email protected] me on Twitter: @allisterheath Tuesday 25 January 2011 9:40 pm whatsappcenter_img Share KCS-content whatsapp by Taboolaby TaboolaSponsored LinksSponsored LinksPromoted LinksPromoted LinksYou May LikeMoneyPailShe Was A Star, Now She Works In ScottsdaleMoneyPailTotal PastThe Ingenious Reason There Are No Mosquitoes At Disney WorldTotal PastMisterStoryWoman Files For Divorce After Seeing This Photo – Can You See Why?MisterStorySerendipity TimesInside Coco Chanel’s Eerily Abandoned Mansion Frozen In TimeSerendipity TimesBrake For ItThe Most Worthless Cars Ever MadeBrake For ItBetterBe20 Stunning Female AthletesBetterBeSenior Living | Search AdsNew Senior Apartments Coming to Scottsdale (Take A Look at The Prices)Senior Living | Search Adsautooverload.comDeclassified Vietnam War Photos The Public Wasn’t Meant To Seeautooverload.comElite HeraldExperts Discover Girl Born From Two Different SpeciesElite Herald Tags: NULLlast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *